aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/modules/MacroLogFeature.cmake
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org>2006-09-04 21:40:24 +0000
committerAlexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org>2006-09-04 21:40:24 +0000
commit23455a0ebf1a944a4b00bde65074fea3d3c04e82 (patch)
treeeb8e1cb53e410e89a146ce0afd7499038382ef2a /modules/MacroLogFeature.cmake
parent1bdb8235e318ff7522f8c79beedd2e8359c4367e (diff)
downloadextra-cmake-modules-23455a0ebf1a944a4b00bde65074fea3d3c04e82.tar.gz
extra-cmake-modules-23455a0ebf1a944a4b00bde65074fea3d3c04e82.tar.bz2
Add a short version of the BSD copyright notice.
Is it ok that way ? I just reference licenses/BSD without further explanation where to find the licenses/ subdirectory. This is legal stuff, so I could need some good advice from somebody who knows this better than me. The BSD license in kdelibs/licenses/BSD also doesn't contain the no-endorsement clause: # The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products # derived from this software without specific prior written permission. Is there a special reason why it doesn't ? If I would like to have this clause too, do I need to add another license file to licenses/ or should I simply put it in the same directory as the cmake scripts ? Then one could simply state: # This code is available under the BSD license, see the accompanying cmake-script-licensing. So, what's the correct and best way to deal with this ? Alex CCMAIL: kde-core-devel@kde.org svn path=/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/; revision=580959
Diffstat (limited to 'modules/MacroLogFeature.cmake')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions