From 2034e3ce7593f04d251b634bfe2d71b30f15ea3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Funk <kfunk@kde.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:17:34 +0100
Subject: Prefer nullptr over Q_NULLPTR

---
 autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp')

diff --git a/autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp b/autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp
index b0c545fc..2a26c155 100644
--- a/autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp
+++ b/autotests/kconfig_compiler/kconfigcompiler_test_signals.cpp
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void KConfigCompiler_Test_Signals::cleanupTestCase()
 
 struct TestSettersArg {
     // default constructor required for Q_DECLARE_METATYPE
-    TestSettersArg() : obj(Q_NULLPTR) {}
+    TestSettersArg() : obj(nullptr) {}
     template<typename T>
     TestSettersArg(T* object) : obj(object) {
         // we can also call static methods using object->foo() so this works for all four cases
-- 
cgit v1.2.1